Lucky on Purpose
A psychologist spent a decade studying lucky and unlucky people. The difference wasn't chance. It was what they noticed.
Related articles
Some people seem to have all the luck. They meet the right people, stumble onto great opportunities, and things somehow work out. Others feel like they can never catch a break.
Before you read on, try something. Count how many times the word "lucky" appears in this article, starting with the next paragraph. Only that exact word counts, not "luck," "unlucky," or "luckier." Keep a tally as you go.
Ready? Here's the question this article is about: what if the difference between lucky people and everyone else isn't entirely about chance? What if luck is, at least partly, a skill?
The newspaper test
British psychologist Richard Wiseman spent about ten years studying hundreds of people who described themselves as exceptionally fortunate or unfortunate. He interviewed them, tested their personalities, and ran experiments to find out what separated the two groups.
One experiment stood out.
Wiseman handed participants a newspaper and asked them to count the photographs inside. The people who considered themselves unlucky took about two minutes. The lucky group often finished in seconds.
Same newspaper. Same task. Wildly different results. We'll come back to why.
Four habits of lucky people
From his interviews and experiments, Wiseman identified four patterns.
1. They create more chances. Lucky people tend to be open to new experiences and keep wider social networks. You can't predict which conversation will change your life, but you can have more of them.
2. They trust their instincts. Not every gut feeling is right, but people who decide without endless overanalyzing are more likely to act on opportunities before they disappear.
Stop counting. The answer is 11. Feel free to keep reading as normal.
3. They expect good things. Positive expectations change behavior. Someone who thinks an opportunity might work out is more likely to pursue it. Someone who expects to fail may never try. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy in the most practical sense.
4. They turn setbacks around. Lucky people still lose jobs, face disappointments, and make mistakes. They just tend to look for what's useful next, instead of treating every setback as proof the universe is against them.
Can you become luckier?
Wiseman tested that too. He ran what he called a "Luck School," teaching participants exercises built on the four habits, like keeping a daily log of fortunate moments and deliberately varying their routines. Most reported feeling luckier, and happier, afterward.
Two honest caveats. First, those results were self-reported, so they show people felt luckier, not that random events changed. Second, much of Wiseman's luck research was published for general audiences rather than in peer-reviewed journals, so it's best treated as suggestive, not settled.
But the core idea fits broader research on attention and expectations: what you look for shapes what you find, and what you expect shapes what you try.
Luck loves company
One ingredient runs through all four habits: other people.
Picture two coworkers. One eats lunch alone, rarely talks to colleagues outside their team, and sticks to the same routine. The other occasionally grabs coffee with someone new or joins a walking group.
Neither can control random events. But the second one is giving luck far more places to show up: a new friendship, a helpful introduction, an idea they'd never have had alone.
Sometimes what we call luck starts with a simple hello.
The message on page two
So why did the lucky group finish the newspaper test so fast?
On the second page, Wiseman had printed a large message telling readers to stop counting, along with the exact number of photographs. The lucky participants were far more likely to spot it. The unlucky ones were so focused on counting that they looked right past it.
He'd also hidden a second message offering a cash reward to anyone who noticed it. Again, the lucky group was more likely to find it.
This article had a page two too. In the middle of the four habits, a plain sentence told you to stop counting and gave you the answer: 11.
Did you see it? If you did, you did exactly what Wiseman's lucky participants did. If you scrolled right past it, you're in good company. Most people focused on a task miss what's sitting in plain sight. The good news, if Wiseman is right, is that noticing can be practiced.
Try this: the seven-day luck experiment
For one week, practice three habits:
1. Notice one fortunate moment a day. It doesn't have to be big. A kind comment, a good morning, a problem that solved itself all count.
2. Create one new opportunity. Start a conversation, try something different, or say yes to an invitation you'd normally skip.
3. Reframe one setback. When something goes wrong, ask what you can learn or do next.
At the end of the week, ask yourself: do I feel luckier than I did seven days ago? Your circumstances may not have changed much. Your attention, expectations, and behavior probably have.
The MIMR connection: building luckier workplaces
Wiseman's four habits map almost exactly onto how we're designing MIMR.
More chances: pods across teams. Each 90-day cycle, employees join a small pod of four or five people, ideally from different parts of the company. That's the coworker who grabs coffee with someone new, built into the program. Every pod is a handful of conversations that wouldn't have happened otherwise.
Noticing what's going right: a win at every re-measurement. Improvement rarely moves on every measure at once. So at each re-measurement, we're building the MIMR app to highlight at least one thing that improved, even when the overall number didn't. It's a page-two message, printed where you can't miss it.
Positive, honest expectations. As we wrote in A Tale of Two Milkshakes, what people expect can shape how they respond. We explain every part of the Recovery Room honestly, including what's still uncertain, so people walk in expecting progress without being promised it.
Turning setbacks around: Next Play. When a pod member's re-measurement comes back flat, their pod can send a Next Play, a one-tap acknowledgment that the miss is over and the team's still with them. (We wrote about where that idea came from in The High-Five Effect.)
Not everything is within anyone's control. Real hardship and random chance still matter. But the conditions that make people luckier, more connections, more noticing, more second attempts, are conditions a workplace can create.
The takeaway
The lucky people in Wiseman's study weren't handed a different newspaper. They just saw more of what was already there.
Maybe becoming luckier isn't about waiting for something wonderful to happen. It's about noticing the good things already happening, and creating more chances for the next one.
Today might just be your lucky day. You might only need to look at page two.
Sources
- Wiseman, R. (2003). The luck factor. Skeptical Inquirer, 27(3).
- Wiseman, R. (2003). The Luck Factor: Changing Your Luck, Changing Your Life. London: Century.
Measure. Improve. Measure. Reward.
That loop is the whole idea. The Science of Improvement is just us showing our work.


